USPTO serial 75147303
SMARTVIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTVIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stittsville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. BRUCE HAMBURG
C BRUCE HAMBURG JORDAN AND HAMBURG122 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and peripherals, namely, data bus interface units, data receivers, data transmitters, and data routers all sold individually and as units and featuring the ability to determine which host computers are located in which subnetworks that are in communication with the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |