Drawing for THE EXPLORER SERIES

USPTO serial 75147387

THE EXPLORER SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE EXPLORER SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER J CRONK

PETER J CRONK DUANE MORRIS & HECKSCHER1 LIBERTY PLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7396UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036insurance services for businesses, namely, providing comprehensive property and liability risk management underwriting and claims administrationACTIVEJan 25, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 2, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 2, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 2, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 2, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 18, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 18, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 23, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 7, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance