USPTO serial 75147565
CREASE REMOVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CREASE REMOVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Valley City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CALVIN E. THORPE
CALVIN E THORPETHORPE N & WESTERN9035 S 700 E STE 200SANDY, UT 84070Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | elongate shaft having a U-shaped handle attached at an intermediate portion thereof, a first end of the U-shaped handle being attached to the shaft so the handle is disposed in a plane substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the shaft and the opposing second end being elongated to extend to an opposing side of the shaft from the point of attachment of the first end to the shaft | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |