USPTO serial 75147742
WIRE BALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIRE BALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Atlantic City, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | sport/game/physical fitness, equipment used to promote and play "WIRE BALL" this is to cover manufacturing distribution of "WIRE BALL" the game/sport/physical fitness equipment and or promoting the "WIRE BALL" concept | ABANDONED | Nov 16, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |