Drawing for WOULDN'T YOU RATHER BE AT HOME?

USPTO serial 75147789

WOULDN'T YOU RATHER BE AT HOME?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOLFSON, FRANCES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOULDN'T YOU RATHER BE AT HOME??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT B. DUNBAR

SCOTT B DUNBAR ZENITH DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION2150 E LAKE COOK RDBUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computers and computer peripherals, namely, batteries, battery chargers, cables, computer networks, diskettes, disk drive controllers, fax cards, integrated cirucits, keyboards, keypads, magnetic and optical disk drives, memory contained in integrated circuits and memory cards, mice, modems, monitors, portable computer docking units, operating system software, video processors and video controllersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance