Drawing for TRANSIT

USPTO serial 75148164

TRANSIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY M. BECKER

JEFFREY M BECKER HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP901 MAIN ST STE 3100DALLAS, TX 75202-3789UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software tool-kit for the purpose of enabling programs to exchange intelligent data objects between multiple software applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 1999ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 18, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 26, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance