USPTO serial 75148539
PURELY COTTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2183102Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 1998
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURELY COTTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE PERE, WI
SEATTLE, WA
SEATTLE, WA
Jacksonville Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary R. Bonzagni, Esq.
Mary R. Bonzagni, Esq. Holland & Bonzagni, P.C.171 Dwight Road, Suite 302Longmeadow, MA 01106-1700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | bathroom tissue; facial tissue; disposable toilet seat covers; disposable diapers; paper towels; paper napkins; disposable medical pillow cases; disposable medical bed sheets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PURELY COTTON PRODUCTS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by LINTERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LINTERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MULTISOFFT PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named PURELY COTTON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 26, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |