USPTO serial 75148546
PROOF IN ADVANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROOF IN ADVANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PROOF IN ADVANCE EDUCATION CORP.
Willowdale, Ontario M2L 2T8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT H.C. MACFARLANE
ROBERT H C MACFARLANE BERESKIN & PARRBOX 40140 KING ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded audio and video cassettes, tapes, compact discs, CD-ROMs, digital video discs, and text files, audio files, video files and graphic files downloadable or accessed from a global communication information network, and all featuring educational material in the field of arts and leisure, science and technology, business and finance, health and fitness, successful living, and general interests | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | promoting and marketing for others products, seminars, training classes, and consulting services through pre-recorded audio and video cassettes, tapes, compact discs, CD-ROMs, digital video discs, and via an on-line electronic communication network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |