Drawing for I KNOW ONE NAME

USPTO serial 75148932

I KNOW ONE NAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I KNOW ONE NAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARTHUR H SEIDEL

2 PENN CTR PLZ STE 1800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035distributorship services in the field of office equipment used for copying, printing, photographic imaging and facsimile transmission; distributorship services in the field of office equipment, namely, computer hardware and computer programs and telecommunications devices; licensing proprietary software for document data transfer and physical conversion from one media to another; consulting services in the fields of temporary employment services and outsourcing temporary employment services and basic office services; and copying, finishing and binding documents for use in litigation by law firms and legal professionalsACTIVE—
037maintenance servicing of office equipment of othersACTIVE—
040file and document imaging, conversion and storage services, namely, conversion of hard copy documents and micrographic files into electronic formats for use in electronic information management systems; document imaging, coding and optical character scanning; document data transfer and physical conversion from one media to another; large volume multiple format backfile conversion; and image printing/blowback and image archivingACTIVE—
042image search and retrieval software development for others; consulting services in the field of computer networking; computer programming for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 23, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 1998REINREINSTATED—
Jul 1, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance