USPTO serial 75149367
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MINNETONKA, MN
MINNETONKA, MN
Fingerhut Financial Services Corporation
St. Louis Park, MN
Other trademarks owned by Fingerhut Financial Services Corporation
MINNETONKA, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane G. Elder
LARRY L SARET MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP180 N STETSON AVE STE 2000CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | marketing the goods and services of others, including telemarketing and distribution of promotional materials; and mailing list services for other businesses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 9, 2002 |
| 036 | financial services, namely, credit card services; and providing extended warranties on consumer products, including electronic equipment, appliances, jewelry and furniture | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 9, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |