USPTO serial 75150001
INTERPASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERPASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M KLEIN
CHARLES TJ WEIGELL BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | gathering of information on on-line service users for advertising or business purposes; dissemination of information on on-line service users to information service providers for advertising or business purposes | ACTIVE | Dec 22, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |