Drawing for CHOICE TELEPHONE

USPTO serial 75150355

CHOICE TELEPHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARMINE, F. D.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOICE TELEPHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin Jordan Harkins

KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS CONLEY ROSE & TAYON PC5700 GRANITE PKWY STE 330PLANO, TX 75024-6608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunications services rendered through common carriers, namely, telephone communication services; telephone voice messaging services; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; facsimile transmission; electronic store-and-forward messaging; telephone connections to a global network, personal communication services; ISDN services; and audio teleconferencingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 16, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 6, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 3, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 16, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance