USPTO serial 75150363
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR M LIEBERMAN
ARTHUR M LIEBERMAN LIEBERMAN & NOWAK LLP461 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | women's and men's cosmetics, namely, facial scrubs, skin cleanser lotions and creams, serums and firming serums in liquid lotion and cream form used to improve the physical appearance and texture of the skins, natural oils, and masks; eye creams; lip cream; body cleansers, skin soap, scrubs, non-medicated bath salts, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, non-medicated skin creams and lotions; skin clarifiers and toners; body oils, skin moisturizers, nail treatments and polishes, namely, oils, lotions and creams used for cleaning, scrubbing, moistening, hardening, strengthening, and polishing nails; cellulite treatments, women's make-up, lipstick, perfumes and colognes; shaving products, namely, pre-shaves, aftershave lotions and creams; and hair shampoo for babies and adults | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |