Drawing for PURALUBE

USPTO serial 75150615

PURALUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRIPI, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURALUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLPONE COMMERCE SQ2005 MARKET ST 22ND FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Petroleum-based lubricant base oils re-refined from used oils for use in the manufacture of automotive and industrial lubricants; and diesel fuelACTIVE—
019Asphalt; and asphalt extendersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 29, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 20, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 24, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance