Drawing for SUNOPTIX

USPTO serial 75150688

SUNOPTIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SUNOPTIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EUGENE D BERMAN

EUGENE D BERMAN ROSEN DAINOW & JACOBS LLP805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail optical store servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 28, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 28, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 23, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 18, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 14, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 16, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 29, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance