USPTO serial 75150725
OPTI PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTI PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Independent Licensed Opticians of Virginia, Inc. (ILOV)
Montpelier, VA
Other trademarks owned by Independent Licensed Opticians of Virginia, Inc. (ILOV)
Independent Licensed Opticians of Virginia, Inc. (ILOV)
Montpelier, VA
Other trademarks owned by Independent Licensed Opticians of Virginia, Inc. (ILOV)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE A TASSAN
BRUCE A TASSAN JACKSON & KELLY2401 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the goods and services of independent licensed opticians by administering a discount membership plan | ABANDONED | Jul 21, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Independent Licensed Opticians of Virginia, Inc. (ILOV)
- Other trademarks owned by Independent Licensed Opticians of Virginia, Inc. (ILOV)
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named OPTI PLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |