USPTO serial 75150899
BRUDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2133905Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 1998
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRUDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bruder Spielwaren GmbH & Co KG
D-90768 Furth-Burgfarrnbach, DE
Bruder Spielwaren GmbH & Co KG
D-90768 Furth-Burgfarrnbach, DE
Bruder Spielwaren GmbH & Co KG
D-90768 Furth-Burgfarrnbach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERIDAN NEIMARK
SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARK PLLC624 NINTH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, namely, toy vehicles, toy ships, toy airplanes, toy musical instruments, party favors in the nature of small toys; surprise package kits composed primarily of toys, namely, toy cars, toy trucks, toy airplanes, toy animals, [ toy binoculars, ] toy magnifying glasses, toy musical instruments, toy whistles, [ toy watches, ] and [ toy guns sold as a unit; toy water pistols, ] toy guns; [ toy watches; ] optical articles in the form of toys, namely, [ toy binoculars and ] toy magnifying glasses | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bruder Spielwaren GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks owned by Bruder Spielwaren GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks owned by Bruder Spielwaren GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BRUDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |