USPTO serial 75151206
EYEVILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYEVILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TODD DEVEAU
TODD DEVEAU DEVEAU COLTON & MARQUISSTE 1400 TWO MIDTOWN PLZ1360 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30309-3209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | services of providing an on-line computer-accessible database and communication service in the form of an electronic directory listing various ophthalmologic professionals, organizations, publications, facts, news, advertisements, public relations material, commercial and non-profit products and services, and bulletin boards along with the electronic addresses of such information and hypertext links to the electronic addresses of such information, providing on-line access to selected ophthalmologic articles, lectures, publications, and professionals, and providing a conduit whereby electronic messages can be transmitted to and from users of the services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |