USPTO serial 75151245
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAN CHAPMAN
DAN CHAPMAN GUNN LEE & MILLER PC300 CONVENT ST STE 1650SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |