Drawing for GRAD DAD, THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS

USPTO serial 75151245

GRAD DAD, THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KREHELY, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAD DAD, THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAN CHAPMAN

DAN CHAPMAN GUNN LEE & MILLER PC300 CONVENT ST STE 1650SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016bumper stickersACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, shirts, hats, and jacketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 20, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 22, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 25, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 6, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 10, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 25, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 26, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 25, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance