Drawing for DTP MALL

USPTO serial 75151844

DTP MALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DTP MALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTHA P SIEGEL

MARTHA P SIEGEL MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035disseminating advertising for others and promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of printed publications and via on-line telecommunications networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Sep 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Nov 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance