Drawing for PCMAX

USPTO serial 75152219

PCMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PCMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM NITKIN

WILLIAM NITKIN WILLIAM NITKIN1320 CTR ST STE 300NEWTON, MA 02459UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUTER SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE, COMPUTER ACCESSORIES AND COMPUTER BOOKSABANDONED—
037REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES OF COMPUTERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2008CU.TCONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 10, 2008CU.GCONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 15, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 15, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 15, 2007CU.DCONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999—
Jul 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2001CU.ICONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance