USPTO serial 75152219
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM NITKIN
WILLIAM NITKIN WILLIAM NITKIN1320 CTR ST STE 300NEWTON, MA 02459UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2008 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |