USPTO serial 75152342
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP FURGANG
STEPHANIE FURGANG ADWAR2 CROSFIELD AVE STE 210WEST NYACK, NY 10994UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | marketing of goods and services through retail stores, catalog retail services, and electronic retail services via electronic means of communication including television and on-line electronic services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |