Drawing for THE AMERICAN ARTIFACT

USPTO serial 75152342

THE AMERICAN ARTIFACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE AMERICAN ARTIFACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILIP FURGANG

STEPHANIE FURGANG ADWAR2 CROSFIELD AVE STE 210WEST NYACK, NY 10994UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042marketing of goods and services through retail stores, catalog retail services, and electronic retail services via electronic means of communication including television and on-line electronic servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 31, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 31, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 31, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 2, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 2, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 13, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 12, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 9, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 17, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance