USPTO serial 75152650
AEROWEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEROWEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI
PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI SCULLY SCOTT MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | recorded computer programs for airline maintenance and operations management, namely, receipt and modification of text, drawings and bit map images; creation; editing and management of illustrated maintenance manuals, production management databases, human resources databases; aircraft equipment and component status databases; production of maintenance and crew/flight plans and schedules; production of task oriented illustrated engineering work/job cards integrating manufacturers documentation, engineering change orders, regulatory directives, with the maintenance history and operational performance of major components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by A.M.S. Advanced Maintenance Systems, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by A.M.S. Advanced Maintenance Systems, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AEROWEB
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |