Drawing for LIFE LINE CLOTHES FOR LIVING

USPTO serial 75152673

LIFE LINE CLOTHES FOR LIVING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFE LINE CLOTHES FOR LIVING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN M EVANS

STEPHEN M EVANS GARRISON & EVANS PS2001 6TH AVE STE 3300SEATTLE, WA 98121-2522UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, tee shirts, tank tops, sweat shirts, sweat pants, shorts, caps, hats, golf shirts, jackets, boxer shorts, jeans, underwear, swim suits, pants, shirts, dresses, skirts, blouses, head bands, wrist bands, visors, aprons, bandannas, belts, overalls, coveralls, socks, vests, scarves, turtleneck shirts, singlets, sport shirts, trousers, tracksuits, knitwear shirts, bodysuits, hosiery, jumpers, leotards, sweaters, jerseys and glovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 8, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 12, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 20, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 20, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance