USPTO serial 75152754
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N NELSON PHELPS
N NELSON PHELPS MCNAMEE HOSEA JERNIGAN & SCOTT PA6411 IVY LN STE 200GREENBELT, MD 20770UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digital printing of business documentation utilizing document specific computer software and digital printing production hardware and equipment | ABANDONED | Jul 5, 1996 |
| 016 | machinery to be used for printing for office functions, financial affairs and to be used in connection with data processing equipment and computers in telecommunications | ABANDONED | Jul 5, 1996 |
| 035 | machinery to be used for printing for office functions, financial affairs and to be used in connection with data processing equipment and computers in telecommunications | ABANDONED | Jul 5, 1996 |
| 036 | machinery to be used for printing for office functions, financial affairs and to be used in connection with data processing equipment and computers in telecommunications | ABANDONED | Jul 5, 1996 |
| 037 | machinery to be used for printing for office functions, financial affairs and to be used in connection with data processing equipment and computers in telecommunications | ABANDONED | Jul 5, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |