USPTO serial 75153122
LEXICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLINGTON, THOMAS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEXICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTINE BADDELL REDFIELD
CHRISTINE BADDELL REDFIELD HOPKINS & CARLEYP O BOX 1469SAN JOSE, CA 95109-1469UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer software design for others, and updating of computer software | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1997 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |