USPTO serial 75153267
GENETIC IMMUNITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2657301Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 3, 2002
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GENETIC IMMUNITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
MCCLEAN, VA
Bethesda, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VALERIE E LOOPER
VALERIE E LOOPER The Law Offices of Valerie E. Looper11726 Lightfall CourtColumbia, MD 21044UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations for use in the treatment for AIDS and cancer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lori, Franco
- Other trademarks owned by Lisziewicz, Julianna
- Other trademarks owned by Lisziewicz, Julianna
- Other trademarks owned by GENETIC IMMUNITY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Lori, Franco
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named GENETIC IMMUNITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |