USPTO serial 75153486
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MESA, AZ
Mesa, AZ
PHOENIX, AZ
Mesa, AZ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert L. Schmeiser, Arlen L. Olsen, Tallie Russell, Sean K. Enos
ALBERT L SCHMEISER ARLEN L OLSEN TAL SCHMEISER OLSEN & WATTS LLP18 E UNIVERSITY DR STE 101MESA, AZ 85201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | exhibitions in the nature of a festival for motorcycle enthusiasts; entertainment in the nature of automobile races; publication of books; fan clubs; educational demonstrations, vehicle driving instruction; entertainment in the nature of fashion shows; entertainment, namely, a continuing show featuring motorcycles distributed over television, satellite, audio and video media; providing facilities for exhibitions; entertainment services, namely, fireworks displays; party planning | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |