USPTO serial 75153512
SCANTALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCANTALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD W GREASON
EDWARD W GREASON KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | dot code readers; dot code writers; voice recorders; image scanners; still video cameras; optical character readers; digital signal processors; computers; computer printers and stand alone printers with devices which information regarding sounds, images, characters and/or computer data is inputted and which converts such information into two-dimensional codes; plotters; computer programs for encoding and/or decoding sound, images, characters and/or data; spreadsheet programs; database programs; word processing programs; desktop publishing programs; page layout programs; authoring programs for computer printers and stand alone printers which read or print two-dimensional codes in which sounds, images, characters and/or computer data are encoded; computer programs for waveform shaping, optical character reading, MIDI, musical composition, musical score writing, computer programs for operating devices which read or print two-dimensional codes in which sounds, images, characters and computer data are encoded for use in telecommunications, scientific calculation and analysis, CAD, CAM, and/or three-dimensional drawing; microscopes for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | endoscopes and cold light sources for medical use; human tissue sample analysis apparatus for medical diagnostic use; blood group analyzers; electrophoresis apparatus and immunological analyzers for diagnostic medical use; catheters for medical use; medical pumps; lasers for medical use; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth and structural replacement parts therefore | ACTIVE | — |
| 015 | musical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | full line of reference books, magazines and newspapers, all in a broad range of areas; instruction manuals in the fields of consumer, educational, industrial, constructional, civil engineering, agricultural and medical goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | toys, namely, musical toys, paper toys and toys for intellectual training and fantasy character toys; games, namely, card games, board games, backgammon, role playing games and hand-held units for playing electronic games | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | encoding of sound images, characters and/or computer data into two-dimensional codes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | printing of two dimensional codes encoded from sound, images, characters or computer data on paper and products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS OPTICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS OPTICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS AMERICA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SCANTALK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |