USPTO serial 75153636
FLOWER DEPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLOWER DEPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES D MCCLUNG
CHARLES D MCCLUNG CHERNOFF, VILHAUER, MCCLUNG & STENZEL1600 ODS TWR601 S W SECOND AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204-3157Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail and wholesale stores featuring flowers, plants, flower arrangements and gardening supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |