USPTO serial 75153859
BEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANE LINOWITZ
JANE LINOWITZ LEVISOHN LERNER BERGER & LANGSAM757 THIRD AVE STE 2400NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical wiring harnesses for use in automobiles comprising electrical wiring and electrical jacks and support brackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |