USPTO serial 75153997
PALM COAST RESORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PALM COAST RESORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNOLD B SILVERMAN
ARNOLD B SILVERMAN ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT600 GRANT ST FORTY SECOND FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Palm Coast Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Palm Coast Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PALM COAST RESORT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |