USPTO serial 75154014
PLAYGROUND STICKER COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAYGROUND STICKER COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PLAYGROUND STICKER COMPANY INC.
Mississauga, Ontario L5S 1M7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARL H SETTLEMYER
CARL H SETTLEMYER LUTZKER & LUTZKER LLP1000 VERMONT AVE STE 450WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | stickers; decals; children's activity sticker sheets and books; printed matter, namely, bond and art paper, children's books, magazines, newsmagazines, newsletters, newspapers, and leaflets; coloring books; comic strips; rubber stamps gift wrapping paper; postcards; greeting cards; collector's cards; trading cards; playing cards; posters; calendars; diaries; notebooks; book markers; paper pennants; printed paper signs; note and memo pads; pencils; pens; crayons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |