Drawing for PET DETECTIVE BY WARRANTECH

USPTO serial 75154027

PET DETECTIVE BY WARRANTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PET DETECTIVE BY WARRANTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDGAR H HAUG

EDGAR H HAUG FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042lost pet locator services, namely, providing identification tags bearing the phone number of a pet registry to the pet owner and the service of referring callers to the owners of lost petsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 7, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 10, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 4, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 31, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 24, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 26, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance