USPTO serial 75154093
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DK-4060 Kirke Saaby, DK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES N DRESSER
JAMES N DRESSER ANTONELLI TERRY STOUT & KRAUS1300 N SEVENTEENTH ST STE 1800ARLINGTON, VA 22209UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | pots; jars for condiments or cookies; lids for pots and jars; saucepans of earthenware; bowls; basins; cups; fruit dishes; ice buckets; food storage containers; storage bowls; drinking troughs; lids for dishes; bottles sold empty; feeding trough; carafes; mugs; statues, statuettes, figurines of porcelain, terra cotta, or glass; soup tureens; tea pots and tea services, not of precious metal, urns; flowerpots; flowerpot bowls; ornamental flowerpots; wash basins; washbowls; vases; rinsing tubs; and pitchers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |