USPTO serial 75154133
J.T. SCHMID'S BREWHOUSE & EATERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 28, 1997
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with J.T. SCHMID'S BREWHOUSE & EATERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CORONA DEL MAR, CA
Orange, CA
Orange, CA
CORONA DEL MAR, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORLAND C. FISCHER
MORLAND C FISCHER2030 MAIN ST STE 1300IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | eat-in restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 27, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARTIC FOOD & BEVERAGE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by J.T.S. Property Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by J.T.S. Property Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by JTS FOOD & BEVERAGE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named J.T. SCHMID'S BREWHOUSE & EATERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 1, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |