USPTO serial 75154218
MICROSONIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2223326Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 1999
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROSONIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BLACKSTONE-NEY ULTRASONICS, INC.
JAMESTOWN, NY
CINCINNATI, OH
JAMESTOWN, NY
Bloomfield, CT
JAMESTOWN, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rowland Richards
Rowland Richards Phillips Lytle LLP3400 HSBC CenterBuffalo, NY 14203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ultrasonic energy generators for wet and liquid industrial processes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 12, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BLACKSTONE-NEY ULTRASONICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE (US) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE BLACKSTONE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ney Ultrasonics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE BLACKSTONE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MICROSONIK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 30, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |