Drawing for NATURE'S BALLANCE

USPTO serial 75154225

NATURE'S BALLANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURE'S BALLANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ STE 22002005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005bulk laxativeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 2, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 9, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 29, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 1999ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 16, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance