Drawing for FRAGRANT BOTANICALS

USPTO serial 75154831

FRAGRANT BOTANICALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2170522Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 30, 1998
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with FRAGRANT BOTANICALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph Quigley

Joseph Quigley Limited Brands5 Limited ParkwayREYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003hair shampoos, hair conditioners and hair styling preparationsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 12, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 12, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 4, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 23, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 2, 2005C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 1998R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Apr 30, 1998CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 1998IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 12, 1998AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 26, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 10, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance