USPTO serial 75154936
LUMINOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMINOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LUMINOUS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
SEATTLE, WA
IMATION PUBLISHING SOFTWARE CORP.
SEATTLE, WA
Seattle, WA
IMATION PUBLISHING SOFTWARE CORP.
SEATTLE, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM K WEIMER
WILLIAM K WEIMER IMATION CORP LEGAL AFFAIRSP O BOX 64898SAINT PAUL, MN 55164-0898UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer software technical consultation services; computer software development and design for others; consulting services in the field of computer software; consulting service infield of computer software development and design for others; computer consultation, namely, providing on-line advice for computer users; providing a computer database in the nature of a computer bulletin board for the transfer of a wide range of information; providing interactive computer databases in fields of desktop publishing, electronic publishing, graphics, typesetting, page layout, color separation and printing, software application and print job execution, sequencing, and management, prepress and print production, graphic arts, and media production; providing multiple-use access to global computer networks, and other computer networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LUMINOUS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by IMATION PUBLISHING SOFTWARE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Luminous Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IMATION PUBLISHING SOFTWARE CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LUMINOUS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |