USPTO serial 75155237
VIRTUAL FINANCIAL MANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATCHISON, ALAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL FINANCIAL MANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E CHRIS CHERRY
E CHRIS CHERRY MORRIS MANNING & MARTIN LLP1600 ATLANTA FINANCIAL CTR3343 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30326Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software that enables financial institutions to provide information to consumers regarding the status of customer accounts, and to execute customer instructions, namely, to transfer funds between accounts and make payments against accounts, pertaining to banking accounts, credit accounts, and brokerage and insurance accounts, and instructional manuals sold therewith | ABANDONED | Aug 7, 1996 |
| 035 | business consultation and business managment services provided in the banking industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | banking services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |