USPTO serial 75155654
THE LITTLE RED PHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE LITTLE RED PHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN H BAZERMAN
STEVEN H BAZERMAN BAZERMAN & DRANGEL PCLINCOLN BLDG60 E 42ND ST STE 1158NEW YORK, NY 10165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | insurance underwriting and claim adjustment services in the field of life, property, casualty and health insurance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |