USPTO serial 75156147
DYNASPECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2550196Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 19, 2002
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DYNASPECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shizuoka-ken, JP
Shizuoka-ken, JP
Hamamatsu-shi Shizuoka, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
Scott S. Havlick HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | spectroscopy or light analyzing system comprising a spectrometer, computer hardware and software, opto-electric detector, fiber optics, and monitors, and parts thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 18, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 30, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |