USPTO serial 75157002
SUPERTEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERTEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Leicestershire LE13 0RQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH D LEWIS
600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SE STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003-4304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metallic flooring for the construction and renovation of courts, tracks and arenas for sports, games, recreation and gymnastics; non-metallic flooring for of courts, tracks and arenas for sports, games, recreation and gymnastics | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | construction, laying and renovation of surfaces for sports, games, recreation and gymnastics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |