USPTO serial 75157384
INNOVATIVE DOCUMENTS & SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNOVATIVE DOCUMENTS & SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF KILLWORTH GOTTMAN HAGAN & SCHAEFFONE DAYTON CTR1 S MAIN ST STE 500DAYTON, OH 45402-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | automated machines for dispensing money orders, computer printers, computer hardware, and computer software for use in the design, production, ordering and management of checks, business forms, labels and other printed and partially printed materials and user manuals distributed therewith; computer software for use in cataloging, reporting, storage, routing and retrieval of printed and electronic documents and user manuals distributed therewith; and computer software for use in warehouse inventory control and user manuals distributed therewith; and telephone calling cards (magnetically encoded) | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | checks, business forms, address and shipping labels, envelopes, telephone calling cards (not magnetically encoded), printing paper; stock paper used for checks, business forms and other printed documents; computer paper, printed and partially printed forms, mailers, computer printer ribbons, office machines for creating and processing mailers and business forms, office supply catalogs and magazines relating office supplies and management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | distributorships in the field of business forms; computer services in the field of documents and business forms, namely, computer database management, storage and retrieval of information and documents for others; consulting services in the field of business forms usage, business forms management services, data processing services, advertising agency services, direct mail advertising, and mail order catalog services featuring business forms and office supplies; computerized business forms ordering services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design of business forms and business forms systems for others; printing services; and computer services, namely, providing a computer data base in the field of business forms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Standard Register Company, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INNOVATIVE DOCUMENTS & SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2000 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |