Drawing for COSPEC EXPLORER

USPTO serial 75157812

COSPEC EXPLORER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COSPEC EXPLORER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DIANE E TURRIFF

DIANE E TURRIFF WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009simulation software and compiler software for use in designing hardware and software products for electronic systemsABANDONED—
042computer design and development services for producers of electronic systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 1999PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 4, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 1998CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 4, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 31, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance