USPTO serial 75158230
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL I J FLEISCHUT
PAUL I J FLEISCHUT SENNIGER POWERS LEAVITT & ROEDELONE METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | stationary readers for public agencies and authorities for use in electronic toll collection, monitoring of commercial vehicle credentials, and traffic monitoring; and vehicle mounted transponders for use exclusively with such stationary readers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |