USPTO serial 75158838
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Protective Technologies International Marketing, L.L.C.
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Protective Technologies International Marketing, L.L.C.
Protective Technologies International Marketing, L.L.C.
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Protective Technologies International Marketing, L.L.C.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PRESTON C REGEHR
PRESTON C REGEHR VAN COTT BAGLEY CORNWALL & MCCARTHY50 S MAIN ST STE 1600SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84144UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nonprescription topical gel for medical use and bandages for skin wounds or burns | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 17, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |