USPTO serial 75159013
BAIKAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERMAN, ALLISON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAIKAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Inchon-shi 403-060, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PRESTON C REGEHR
PRESTON C REGEHR VAN COTT BAGLEY CORNWALL & MCCARTHY50 S MAIN ST STE 1600SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84144UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | hot water heating units, water cooling units, household furnace boilers, gas stoves, instantaneous hot water heating units, air or water cooling installations, hot water heating installations, hot air heating installations and gas refrigerators | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |