Drawing for MIGRATING CORROSION INHIBITORS

USPTO serial 75159195

MIGRATING CORROSION INHIBITORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIGRATING CORROSION INHIBITORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ORRIN M HAUGEN

ORRIN M HAUGEN HAUGEN LAW FIRM PLLP1130 TCF TWR121 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical preparation for use in reduction of corrosion of steel reinforcing members present in concrete structuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 30, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 3, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 16, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 16, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 20, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance